MIPAS itself continues in a long sequence of nominal mode
observations 2 orbits on followed by 3 orbits off (intended to be tested
as an input for ECMWF data assimilation).
Methane and N2O are not a surprise because large errors are
often present at the boundaries of the retrieval range.
Differences in temperature and ozone retrieved values are
instead a concern. Indeed the results of validation that
Ugo and Marco presented at the QWG meeting indicate that
the differences between FR MWs and RR MWs are larger than
the validation accuracy obtained for temperature and ozone.
We expect, therefore, that when the new RR results will be
validated a bias will be found for these two targets.
These MWs are, however, the best selection that we presently
have and, if you agree, we plan to use this set for the
temporary ADF2.
A warning should be made to the user.
Simone comments:
I notice that some significant differences
larger than the retrieval errors are obtained between the
profiles retrieved from the RR and FR spectra.
Large differences are obtained for pressure, temperature
and ozone in the altitude range 30km-50km, for methane
below 20 km and for N2O at 6 km. No significant differences
are observed for H2O,HNO3 and NO2.