Oxford MIPAS meeting#54
11 May 04


Present

Instrument Status [Prev] [Next]
Some details on the Envisat Web-Site including Instrument Availability web-site

L2 OFL Data [Prev] [Next]
In /home/crun/mipas/L2/2PODPA/ [Plots of profile locations]

L2 Anomalies [Prev] [Next]
Updates on anomalies identified at QWG#3
Altitude shift in pointing >33km from 8-16 Feb 2004
Still under investigation
Offset of exactly 1 second between NRT and OFL L2 profiles
Thought to have been fixed with v4.61, although it turns out only to have been fixed in the most recently processed v4.61 NRT data, earlier v4.61 still shows the discrepancy (AB will send an example to ESA)
Error in profile counts assigned to L2 residual spectra
Supposedly fixed in v4.61 but still incorrect (ESA have been informed)

L1 Anomalies [Prev] [Next]
(Reported at the QWG#3 by Bernd Funke (IAA) and also noted by Bianca Dinelli): where scans have more than 17 sweeps some NESR values are set to zero or very small, eg orbits 9322 , 9323, 9324 (S3 mode - across-track) and 6689 (S2 mode - strat/trop exchange)

NH3 Retrievals (AB) [Prev] [Next]
Using OPTIMO plus sequential estimation to deal with low S/N. Retrievable NH3 only at 6km.

OCS Retrievals (AB) [Prev] [Next]
Using OPTIMO in normal mode (independent retrievals).

S6 Mode Microwindows (AD) [Prev] [Next]
S6 mode is 0.1cm-1 spectral resolution, 2km vertical resolution, 100km horizontal resolution

ACVE-2, Frascati, 3-7 May 2004 [Prev] [Next]
Website: http://www.congrex.nl/04m01/
Main conclusions regarding MIPAS species were
Plots from Oxford Posters
Time Series (VP)
Plots of difference of NRT monthly zonal means wrt IG climatology.
[CH4] [H2O] [HNO3] [N2O] [NO2] [O3] [TEM]
NRT/OFL Differences Nov 03 (AB)
Plots of NRT monthly mean and difference of OFL-NRT
[CH4] [H2O] [HNO3] [N2O] [NO2 (ngt)] [NO2 (day)] [O3] [PRE] [TEM]

Continuum Retrievals (GT) [Next]
Starting to look at microwindow continuum retrievals in MIPAS L2 data in order to see if any information can be obtained on aerosol composition.

Email from Rob Koopman (ESRIN) to MIPAS QWG, 28 Apr 2004
A number of tests have been performed to characterise the anomalies affecting the MIPAS interferometer. These tests have shown that the differential speed anomaly persists also when using the redundant electronics. This points to a mechanical error source. After completion of further tests this week, operations will resume on side A after completion of analysis. To avoid the initialisation error (in some cases restart after absolute velocity errors results in reaching the launch lock position, and recently it has been difficult to exit from this position), initially the operations will be resumed at a specific, reduced resolution. The ARB team has calculated an optimal value of 40.99% of its current nominal mode resolution, that must be kept identical during all modes (nominal, offset, RGC, WCC, transitory sweeps, etc).

In view of the above I ask the level 1 and level 2 project leaders Gaetan and Bruno to re-iterate the workplan (already overdue...) and re-allocate therein the remaining resources to achieve with priority the following objective:

Achieve a reconfiguration of the level 1 and level 2 processor to optimise calibration and product data quality when operating at a resultion reduced to 40.99% of its current value

We need to generate: new level 1 configuration files, new calibration planning, new level 2 configuration files for modified nominal mode.

The activities are to be described prior to execution in:

  1. The re-characterisation and recalibration plan, with Gaetan as book captain
  2. The level2 re-configuration and verification plan, for which I request Bruno, as level 2 project leader, to assign a book captain
Please note that this is the top-priority activity, as operations will resume shortly.

Gaetan and Bruno, please provide an update of the workplan by Friday, including resource reassigment and schedule for the finalisation of the plans. I will meet with you both at the ACVE-2.

In more detail, the new operations will resume at a resolution of 62400 fringe counts. this results in a sweep duration of 1.46 seconds. Peter Mosner has calculated that the sweep length will be about 41mm, and that configuration is to be such that slide 1 will move between -21.3 ... +19.7mm, slide 2 will move between -19.7 ... 21.3mm (+0.15mm) ASTRIUM is currently calculating optimal times for the new WCC sequence and the compensation times, allowing us to proceed with generation of CTI's. We will consult QWG members indivitually during the redefinition of CTI values..